Why Are Trade Secrets Particularly Valuable for AI Technology?
While patents, copyrights, and trademarks receive considerable attention in intellectual property strategy, trade secret protection is often the most valuable form of IP protection for artificial intelligence companies. The proprietary algorithms powering ChatGPT, the training methodologies behind Claude, Google’s search ranking algorithms, and the recommendation systems driving platforms like Netflix and Spotify derive much of their competitive value from remaining secret. Unlike patents, which require public disclosure in exchange for limited-term exclusivity, trade secrets can potentially provide perpetual protection—as long as the information remains confidential.
For AI companies, certain types of valuable information are particularly well-suited to trade secret protection. Training datasets that have been carefully curated, cleaned, and labeled represent years of investment and provide competitive advantages that would be impossible to replicate. Model architectures and hyperparameter configurations discovered through extensive experimentation embody tremendous technical know-how. Preprocessing techniques, feature engineering methods, and data augmentation strategies that improve model performance constitute valuable trade secrets. Business intelligence about what works and what doesn’t—the “negative know-how” gained from failed experiments—can be as valuable as successful approaches.
However, trade secret protection requires active effort to maintain. Unlike patents or copyrights that arise from the creative act itself, trade secrets exist only as long as the information remains secret and the owner takes reasonable steps to protect confidentiality. A single public disclosure can irrevocably destroy trade secret protection. Employee departures, vendor relationships, security breaches, and reverse engineering all pose threats to trade secret preservation.
Understanding how to identify, protect, and enforce trade secrets is essential for AI companies seeking to maximize the value of their proprietary technologies while managing the risks inherent in maintaining confidential information.
What Legal Framework Governs Trade Secret Protection?
The Defend Trade Secrets Act and Uniform Trade Secrets Act
Trade secret protection in the United States operates under two parallel frameworks:
**The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA):** Enacted in 2016, the DTSA created a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. Previously, trade secret cases were primarily state law claims. The DTSA enables trade secret owners to file federal lawsuits for misappropriation, provides for ex parte seizure of property in extraordinary circumstances to prevent dissemination of trade secrets, and authorizes injunctive relief, damages, and attorney’s fees.
**The Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA):** Adopted by 48 states and the District of Columbia (with minor variations), the UTSA provides state-level trade secret protection. The UTSA defines trade secrets broadly and establishes remedies for misappropriation.
Both frameworks define trade secrets similarly, requiring that information:
**Derives independent economic value from not being generally known:** The information must provide competitive advantage because it’s not readily ascertainable by proper means by others who could obtain value from its disclosure or use.
**Is subject to reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy:** The owner must take affirmative steps to protect the confidentiality of the information.
**Constitutes information:** Trade secrets can include formulas, patterns, compilations, programs, devices, methods, techniques, or processes. For AI companies, this encompasses algorithms, source code, training data, model architectures, and proprietary methodologies.
What Information Qualifies as a Trade Secret?
For AI companies, potentially protectable trade secrets include:
**Algorithms and Source Code:** Proprietary algorithms implementing machine learning models, optimization techniques, or data processing pipelines qualify if they’re not publicly known and provide competitive advantages. While software can be copyrighted, copyright protects only expression, not the underlying algorithms or logic. Trade secret protection can cover the functionality itself.
**Training Datasets:** Curated, cleaned, and labeled datasets represent enormous investments. If datasets are proprietary and not publicly available, they can constitute trade secrets. The specific data sources, collection methodologies, and quality control processes also qualify.
**Model Architectures:** The specific neural network architectures, layer configurations, activation functions, and connectivity patterns that comprise a model can be trade secrets if they’re not disclosed publicly.
**Hyperparameters and Training Configurations:** The specific learning rates, batch sizes, regularization parameters, and other hyperparameters discovered through experimentation provide competitive advantages if kept confidential.
**Business Methods and Strategies:** AI deployment strategies, pricing methodologies, customer acquisition approaches, and partnership strategies can qualify as trade secrets.
**Technical Know-How:** The accumulated knowledge of what techniques work, what approaches fail, and why certain design choices were made constitutes valuable trade secret information.
Not all information qualifies for trade secret protection. Information that’s generally known in the industry, readily ascertainable from public sources, or independently developed by others without misappropriation doesn’t qualify. Similarly, information disclosed in patents, publications, or public presentations loses trade secret protection.
What Reasonable Measures Must Companies Take to Protect Trade Secrets?
Contractual Protections
Contracts form the foundation of trade secret protection programs:
**Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs):** NDAs should be executed with all employees, contractors, advisors, investors, potential partners, and anyone else who might access confidential information. NDAs should clearly define what information is confidential, specify obligations to maintain confidentiality and restrict use to authorized purposes, survive termination of the relationship, and specify remedies for breach including injunctive relief.
**Employment Agreements:** Employment agreements should include robust confidentiality provisions that define confidential information broadly, prohibit unauthorized disclosure or use, clarify that the company owns all work product and inventions created during employment, and survive termination of employment. Assignment of inventions provisions ensure that AI-related innovations belong to the company.
**Contractor and Consultant Agreements:** Third-party developers, data labelers, cloud service providers, and other vendors accessing confidential information should execute agreements including confidentiality obligations, work-for-hire provisions assigning IP rights, restrictions on data retention and use, and security requirements.
**Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements:** Where enforceable (laws vary significantly by jurisdiction), non-compete agreements prevent departing employees from immediately joining competitors where they might use or disclose trade secrets. Non-solicitation agreements prevent recruiting other employees or soliciting customers.
California and several other states severely restrict or prohibit non-compete agreements, so companies cannot rely solely on these for protection. However, confidentiality obligations remain enforceable even in states that restrict non-competes.
Access Controls and Information Security
Technical security measures demonstrate reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy:
**Physical Security:** Restrict physical access to facilities where sensitive work occurs through access controls, visitor logs, and badge systems. Secure disposal of confidential documents and media.
**Network Security:** Implement firewalls, intrusion detection systems, VPNs for remote access, and network segmentation isolating sensitive systems from general networks.
**Access Controls:** Use role-based access controls limiting access to confidential information based on job functions. Implement the principle of least privilege, granting only minimum necessary access. Maintain logs of access to sensitive systems and data.
**Encryption:** Encrypt confidential data at rest and in transit. Use strong encryption for training datasets, model weights, source code repositories, and communications.
**Authentication:** Implement multi-factor authentication for access to sensitive systems. Use strong password policies and regular password rotation.
**Data Loss Prevention (DLP):** Deploy DLP tools monitoring for unauthorized data transfers, blocking unapproved file uploads or email attachments, and detecting potential data exfiltration.
**Secure Development Practices:** Use private code repositories with access controls, implement code review processes, and prohibit use of public repositories for proprietary code.
Policies, Training, and Culture
Organizational policies and employee awareness are critical:
**Written Trade Secret Policies:** Develop comprehensive written policies identifying categories of confidential information, specifying handling requirements, defining authorized access and use, and establishing consequences for violations.
**Employee Training:** Regular training programs should educate employees about what information is confidential, their obligations to protect trade secrets, proper handling procedures, and reporting requirements for suspected breaches.
**Confidentiality Markings:** Mark confidential documents, presentations, and code repositories with confidentiality legends. While not legally required, marking reinforces confidentiality and strengthens enforcement.
**Clean Desk Policies:** Require employees to secure confidential materials when not in use and prohibit leaving sensitive documents on desks or in view of visitors.
**Exit Procedures:** Implement rigorous exit procedures for departing employees including return of all company property, certification of deletion of confidential information from personal devices, exit interviews reinforcing continuing confidentiality obligations, and reminders of post-employment restrictions.
**Incident Response:** Develop procedures for detecting, investigating, and responding to suspected trade secret misappropriation or security breaches.
How Do AI Companies Balance Trade Secret Protection with Business Operations?
Managing Third-Party Relationships
AI companies often work with external partners, creating trade secret challenges:
**Cloud Service Providers:** Storing training data and models on AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure requires carefully structured agreements ensuring provider confidentiality obligations, data encryption and isolation, restricted provider access to customer data, and right to audit security controls.
**Data Labeling Services:** Outsourcing data labeling to vendors like Scale AI or Labelbox requires NDAs, restrictions on vendor retention of data, security requirements for vendor systems, and audit rights.
**Open-Source Contributions:** Contributing to open-source projects while maintaining trade secrets requires clear internal policies about what can be open-sourced, code review processes before external contributions, and separation between proprietary and open-source development.
**Academic Collaborations:** University partnerships can advance research but create publication pressures conflicting with trade secret protection. Agreements should specify what information may be published, allow reasonable review periods before publication, and allocate IP rights clearly.
**Customer Deployments:** On-premise customer deployments or providing model access creates disclosure risks. Technical measures like model encryption, API-only access without model exposure, and monitoring for extraction attempts help maintain confidentiality.
Addressing the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine
When employees with access to trade secrets join competitors, the “inevitable disclosure doctrine” (recognized in some jurisdictions) allows employers to obtain injunctions preventing the employee from working in roles where they would inevitably rely on or disclose former employer’s trade secrets.
However, this doctrine is controversial and narrowly applied. Companies cannot rely solely on inevitable disclosure and should:
**Document Specific Trade Secrets:** Maintain detailed records of specific trade secrets the employee accessed, not just generic descriptions of confidential information.
**Demonstrate Actual Threat:** Show specific evidence that the new employment poses a real risk of disclosure or use, such as substantially similar job responsibilities or direct competitive overlap.
**Tailor Restrictions:** Seek narrowly tailored relief preventing only activities that would necessarily involve trade secret use, not blanket prohibitions on all employment.
**Consider Alternatives:** Garden leave provisions paying employees during non-compete periods, buyouts of employment agreements, or negotiated restrictions may be more practical than litigation.
Balancing Transparency with Protection
AI companies face pressure for transparency from multiple stakeholders:
**Investors and Acquirers:** Due diligence requires disclosing confidential information. Use robust NDAs, limit disclosures to necessary information, provide information in controlled data rooms with access tracking, and restrict printing or downloading.
**Customers:** Enterprise customers conducting security or technical assessments may request detailed information. Provide only information necessary for legitimate evaluation purposes, use NDAs, and consider providing higher-level architectural information rather than implementation details.
**Regulatory Bodies:** Data protection regulators, securities regulators, or sector-specific agencies may require disclosures. Understand legal obligations to disclose, provide minimum necessary information, and request confidential treatment where available.
**Employees:** Balance the need for employees to access information to perform jobs against security risks. Grant access based on need-to-know principles and train employees on protection obligations.
What Remedies Are Available for Trade Secret Misappropriation?
Injunctive Relief
Trade secret owners can seek court orders preventing use or disclosure:
**Preliminary Injunctions:** Before trial, courts can issue preliminary injunctions prohibiting threatened or ongoing misappropriation if the trade secret owner demonstrates likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm absent an injunction, that the balance of hardships favors the owner, and that the public interest supports the injunction.
**Permanent Injunctions:** After trial, courts can issue permanent injunctions prohibiting future use or disclosure of trade secrets. The duration of injunctions must be reasonable and cannot extend beyond the period the information remains secret or the competitive advantage it provides.
**Ex Parte Seizure:** The DTSA authorizes extraordinary ex parte seizure orders in rare cases to prevent propagation or dissemination of trade secrets, though these require showing that less drastic measures are inadequate.
Monetary Damages
Multiple damage theories may apply:
**Actual Loss:** Compensation for demonstrable losses suffered due to misappropriation, including lost profits, unjust enrichment of the defendant, or reasonable royalty for unauthorized use.
**Unjust Enrichment:** Profits the defendant obtained through misappropriation that would have gone to the trade secret owner.
**Reasonable Royalty:** A hypothetical reasonable royalty that would have been negotiated for authorized use of the trade secrets.
**Exemplary Damages:** If misappropriation is willful and malicious, courts can award up to twice actual damages as punitive exemplary damages.
**Attorney’s Fees:** In cases of willful and malicious misappropriation or bad faith, courts can award reasonable attorney’s fees to prevailing parties.
Criminal Prosecution
The Economic Espionage Act provides criminal penalties for trade secret theft:
**Economic Espionage (18 U.S.C. § 1831):** Stealing trade secrets to benefit foreign governments carries fines up to $5 million per organization and imprisonment up to 15 years for individuals.
**Theft of Trade Secrets (18 U.S.C. § 1832):** Stealing trade secrets for commercial advantage carries fines up to $5 million per organization and imprisonment up to 10 years for individuals.
Criminal prosecution is reserved for serious cases but provides powerful deterrence against trade secret theft, particularly involving foreign actors or departing employees joining competitors.
How Should AI Companies Respond to Suspected Trade Secret Misappropriation?
Investigation and Evidence Preservation
Upon discovering potential misappropriation:
**Immediate Steps:** Preserve all evidence including electronic communications, access logs, and file transfer records. Issue litigation hold notices to prevent destruction of relevant documents. Secure systems potentially affected by the breach.
**Internal Investigation:** Determine what information was accessed or disclosed, identify responsible parties, assess the extent of potential damage, and document findings contemporaneously.
**Forensic Analysis:** Engage computer forensics experts to analyze systems, recover deleted files, examine file access and transfer logs, and preserve evidence in admissible format.
**Consult Counsel Immediately:** Trade secret litigation is time-sensitive and technically complex. Experienced counsel can preserve evidence, assess legal options, and initiate appropriate proceedings quickly.
Demand Letters and Negotiation
Before litigation, consider:
**Cease-and-Desist Letters:** Formal letters demanding that recipients stop using or disclosing trade secrets and return or destroy confidential materials. These can resolve disputes without litigation while establishing a record of the owner’s efforts to protect rights.
**Negotiated Resolutions:** Settlements may involve employment restrictions preventing the former employee from working on competitive projects, agreements to destroy or return confidential materials, covenants not to use specific technologies, or financial compensation.
**Balancing Considerations:** Weigh litigation costs, risk of additional disclosure through discovery, public relations implications, and business relationships against the value of the misappropriated secrets and deterrence benefits.
What Emerging Challenges Do AI Companies Face in Trade Secret Protection?
Model Extraction and Reverse Engineering
AI models deployed as APIs or embedded in products face extraction risks:
**Model Inversion Attacks:** Attackers query models systematically to extract training data or reconstruct model parameters. Protection strategies include rate limiting API queries, detecting anomalous query patterns, adding noise to outputs, and implementing usage monitoring.
**Knowledge Distillation:** Competitors can train smaller models to mimic larger proprietary models by using API outputs as training data. Legal remedies include terms of service prohibiting this use, technical measures detecting systematic querying, and potential copyright claims if outputs are creative.
**Watermarking and Fingerprinting:** Embed signatures in model outputs or behaviors enabling detection when competitors deploy extracted models.
Employee Mobility in the AI Sector
High employee turnover and competitive recruiting create challenges:
**Talent Competition:** AI talent shortages drive aggressive recruiting and compensation, increasing risks of employees taking confidential information to competitors.
**Remote Work:** Distributed teams create data security challenges when employees work from home networks and personal devices.
**Open-Source Culture:** AI development often involves open-source contributions, creating tension between transparency norms and trade secret protection.
Companies should balance competitive recruiting with robust trade secret protection through reasonable restrictions rather than overly broad restraints, attractive retention strategies reducing turnover, and clear policies about what can and cannot be shared externally.
International Trade Secret Risks
Global operations create additional vulnerabilities:
**Varying Legal Protection:** Trade secret laws differ internationally. China amended its Anti-Unfair Competition Law in 2019 to strengthen trade secret protection, but enforcement remains challenging. The EU Trade Secrets Directive harmonized protection across EU members.
**Cross-Border Data Transfers:** Data localization requirements and export controls affect ability to protect trade secrets globally. Consider regional data storage, encryption for cross-border transfers, and compliance with local data protection laws.
**Foreign Espionage:** Nation-state actors target AI technology. Implement enhanced security for sensitive systems, vet foreign partnerships carefully, and report suspected economic espionage to authorities.
Conclusion: Building a Comprehensive Trade Secret Protection Program
Trade secrets represent critical competitive advantages for AI companies, protecting proprietary algorithms, training data, and technical know-how that drive innovation and market differentiation. Unlike patents that eventually expire, trade secrets can provide perpetual protection—but only if companies implement comprehensive programs maintaining confidentiality.
Effective trade secret protection requires a multi-layered approach combining contractual protections through NDAs and employment agreements, technical security measures including access controls and encryption, organizational policies and employee training, and prompt enforcement against misappropriation. Companies must balance the need to protect confidential information with operational necessities like vendor relationships, customer deployments, and employee collaboration.
Given the high stakes and complexity of trade secret law, particularly in the rapidly evolving AI sector, consulting experienced intellectual property counsel is essential for developing and implementing effective protection programs, responding to suspected misappropriation, and navigating the legal landscape.
Contact Rock LAW PLLC for Trade Secret Protection Strategy
At Rock LAW PLLC, we provide comprehensive trade secret protection services for AI companies, technology startups, and innovative businesses safeguarding valuable proprietary information. Our experienced attorneys help clients develop and implement trade secret programs tailored to their technologies and business models.
We assist clients with:
- Trade secret identification and classification
- Confidentiality agreement drafting and negotiation
- Employment agreement provisions for IP protection
- Trade secret protection policy development
- Security and access control consulting
- Third-party relationship structuring to protect confidential information
- Employee training program development
- Trade secret misappropriation investigation and litigation
- Injunctive relief proceedings
- Criminal trade secret theft referrals
Whether you’re building a trade secret protection program from scratch, responding to employee departures that threaten confidential information, or pursuing trade secret misappropriation claims, our attorneys provide strategic counsel that protects your most valuable assets.
Contact us today to discuss your trade secret protection needs and learn how we can help safeguard your AI innovations and proprietary technologies.
Related Articles:
- How Do You Patent Machine Learning Models and AI Algorithms?
- How Do Software Licensing Agreements Apply to AI-Generated Code?
- What Are the Legal Requirements for Training AI Models on Copyrighted Data?
Rock LAW PLLC
Business Focused. Intellectual Property Driven.
www.rock.law/